Gun control has been identified as one of the most conflict-ridden matters in American policies. With every mass shooting that occurs, it has been observed that some individuals have to be killed indiscriminately, and this leads to the growth of the antagonism between the sides of the gun control argument. Those who are suggesting for stricter gun regulations fear for their safety due to the large number of people who own firearms in the country. Also, the country has recorded high cases of accidents, assaults, murders, suicides and even attempts as well as police intervention all connected to gun ownership. On the other hand, there is fear of a loss of safety by the opponents of regulatory arguments. They are arguing that restricting firearms ownership would leave citizens with no ways to protect themselves. However, due to the incidences observed from gun ownership, it is relevant to have control measures. Gun control can be done by having strict purchasing rules, pass laws that target reduction of firearms violence and terminate legal immunity for the gun manufacturers.
One of the ways of controlling the use of guns in the country is by enacting strict laws when one wants to purchase a firearm. It is apparent that gun deaths have been increasing steadily and are almost as lethal as traffic accidents. Lawmakers can ensure that they implement more strict requirements for one to own a gun. Research has shown that it is easier for one to be a legal gun owner than to be a legitimate driver. Therefore, it is relevant to have a more operative strategy that would need every shopper of any age to acquire an authorization that comprises registration of all procurements and an adequate training program as well. Some states have been observed to have strict laws on gun ownership. For instance, California needs applicants to pass a transcribed assessment and register in a gun safety class to get procurement licenses (Christopher, 2019). As such, all states should implement such forms of requirements and the legislators should make them more efficient by passing strict laws about the purchase of guns.
It is essential for the gun regulations that are passed to primarily decrease gun violence. All the gun laws produced are not equivalent. The presence of resilient firearms regulations in a state such as the conducting of a background check for all the private deals and limitations on numerous purchases would be linked with low proportions of gun homicides. It is important to note that this is according to inquiry published in JAMA Internal Medicine (Siegel & Boine, 2019). Research has also obtained associations between the right-to-carry regulations that need governments to issue concealed-carry authorizations to people who satisfy specific wants and an increase in crimes conducted through the utilization of firearms. The lack of these policies, according to the National Bureau of Economic, would have led to violent crime being 13% to 15% higher (Donohue, Aneja & Weber, 2019).
The gun industry has unusual forms of protection from federal law. There is the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that guards gun creators and even sellers from civil assertions conveyed by gun violence victims. As such, they are not held liable for the misuse of what they sell. However, by being held accountable, it would motivate them to make firearms safer (Merrefield, 2019). Therefore, it is fundamental for constitutional freedom for gun manufacturers to be terminated as a way of effective control.
Gun control in the United States can be done by enacting strict purchase rules, pass laws that target gun violence reduction and end legal immunity for the manufacturers. Stringent regulations for those who want to buy guns will further reduce deaths linked to them and reduce their utilization. Also, it is vital to ensure that there are strong firearm laws like undertaking a check for all private trades and limitations on numerous procurements as well. Gun manufacturers should also be held liable for the misuse of the firearms that they sell, and thus, their immunity dismissed.
